“One
Simple Question”
Maundy
Thursday Service
Thursday,
March 20, 2008
Exodus 12: 1-4,
11-14
Psalm 116: 1-2,
12-19
1 Corinthians 11:
23-26
John
13: 1-17, 31b-35
It
all came down to one simple question.
And
the question was this --“do you want cream with that?”
But
I am getting far ahead of myself.
Tonight
is Maundy Thursday.
It
is the night upon which we read about the events that took place on the night
before Jesus was betrayed, judged, abandoned, condemned, beaten, and
crucified.
As
we all know so well, his last night was spent with his friends. In three of the four Gospel accounts, their
last night together was spent at that famous meal during which he took a loaf
of bread and broke it; and took a cup of wine, and shared it – and asked his
friends, when they gathered to eat and drink together, simply to remember him
and what he was doing for them. All
these many centuries later, we continue to remember that meal; it is one of the
most important and central celebrations of our faith.
In
the Gospel of John, however, the activities during that last meal with his
disciples were quite different. Rather
than focusing on the bread and the wine, the author of the Gospel of John
focuses, instead, on Jesus’ act of washing his disciples’ feet. In many traditions – and perhaps in another
year in this congregation -- the ritual of footwashing
is a central action in the celebrations of Maundy Thursday. It is interesting to contemplate the fact
that if we only had the Gospel of John, washing people’s feet would be as
synonymous with the Christian faith as are the symbols of bread and wine.
The
story of the footwashing is a fascinating passage to
contemplate. Jesus, the soon-to-be
crucified Messiah – whose arrival into Jerusalem had been heralded by the
crowds, and whose presence in the city had caused such an excited and
controversial reaction – was undoubtedly a powerful man. Everyone – his friends, his followers, the
gathered crowds, even the religious authorities – was paying a great deal of
attention to his words and actions. His
powerful teachings, his actions in the Temple, the attention that he was attracting
even from the Greek visitors in Jerusalem -- all offered clear and tangible
evidence that he was a man of charisma and of power who had the ability to
arouse very significant passions in the hearts and minds of those who
encountered him.
And
yet, in one simple act, Jesus completely overturned the dynamics of power. In one simple act, the king became the slave,
the master became the servant -- and those who had been the servants were
lifted into positions of honour. The One whose
friends had named him their Lord and Messiah lowered himself, and, in so doing,
not only elevated those who had been his followers, but challenged them to
embrace a similarly humbling, upside-down, countercultural approach to the
understandings of power.
And
how did he effect this transformation in the dynamics of power?
Jesus
got up from the table, removed his cloak, got down on his hands and feet, and washed
the feet of his friends. Without a
doubt, many must have been dumbfounded – but when he got to Peter, the
incomprehension – and the resistance -- was finally verbalized. “You will never wash my feet,” said
Peter.
You
will never wash my feet. I am the servant,
Lord; you are the One who is to be served.
I am the humble servant, here, Jesus – but if I allow you to serve me,
then I am no longer sure who I am. You
will never wash my feet.
We
can all understand the sentiment that underlies Peter’s words. This was Jesus; this was his Lord; how could he let Jesus wash his feet? Peter
wanted to serve Christ; but there was Christ, stooping to serve Peter.
It
was uncomfortable, for Peter, to be served by One who he
thought that he was supposed to be serving.
It upset his understandings of the dynamics of power.
And
we are not that much different from Peter.
So
often, we speak of Christ in highly exalted terms; we call him Lord; we call
him Master; we call him our King, our Head, our Sovereign. But how many of us would truly be willing to
allow Christ to serve us? If Christ were
to walk in here, right now, most of us would bow down, stoop in his presence, fall on our knees before him. But how many of us would be
willing to allow him to stoop down before us, and use his own clothes to wash
our feet? How many of us would squirm in
discomfort? How many of us would be too
proud to let Christ perform such a simple and humble act?
The
reason why we would be uncomfortable in allowing him to do this is because we
still have not fully embraced the strange dynamics of power in the kingdom of
God – that kingdom where the lowly are lifted up, and the proud are
humbled. It is still far more empowering
to perceive oneself as having something to give than to perceive oneself as
being in need of help. After all, as
long as we have something to give, we have power.
But
to humble oneself to the point of being willing to receive is a prerequisite
for our acceptance of the salvation that Christ offers to us. With our self-perceptions of importance and
power, most of us are still trying to work out our own security, our own status
– even our own salvation – rather than being willing to allow Christ to do for
us what only he can do for us.
At
some point, every one of us has to let go.
We have to let go of our constant desire to be good enough, holy enough,
loving enough, humble enough. We have to
let go of our constant desire to be the self-giving, compassionate
servant. We need to accept that we are
not as powerful as we think that we are, but broken; we are not as clean as we
think that we are, but in need of his cleansing touch; we are not as selfless
as we think that we are, but in need of his call to selflessness; we are not
able to save ourselves – and so, we must have the courage, and the humility, to
let Christ do, for us, what we cannot do for ourselves. We need to let him wash us, and forgive us,
and save us.
But
in order for us to realize what we need, we need to let go of our
understandings of power. We need to
realize that in the kingdom of God, we not only need the willingness to serve,
but also the humility to allow ourselves to be served. If we are going to see the kingdom of God,
there are times when we, like Peter, need to allow ourselves to be served –
sometimes even by those who we think we are supposed to be serving.
For me, these complexities of the dynamics of power and of servanthood
came alive, in this very building, many years ago. At the time, I was a seminary student, and
was able to rearrange my school schedule in such a way that I could avoid Tuesday
morning classes and thereby free myself to help with the midnight to six am
shift at the Out of the Cold. Although I
think that it was helpful, I also have to admit that I was quite proud of
myself for having found the opportunity to arrange my schedule in that way.
Late
one night in the dead of winter – or, perhaps to be more exact, very early one
morning in the middle of winter, before the sun rose – there was a relatively
young guy who had been having trouble getting to sleep, so we ended up sitting
in the glassed-in vestibule by the Simcoe Street doors and talking for a good
part of the night. We discussed many
things – where we each had grown up, what was going on in the news, what I was
studying at Knox College, what it was like to live on the street. He told me about the most successful places
that he had found to panhandle, and what he hoped to do when he got off of the
street. I was quite convinced that I was
doing a really great thing by being such a wonderful listening ear to this
bedraggled child of God.
But
then things changed. There was a period
of time, in the night, when the evening’s coffee was finished but the
percolators were not yet turned on in preparation for the morning
breakfast. I must have yawned, because
my companion mentioned that he knew of a 24 hour coffee shop that was not too
far from the church. He asked me if he
could go and buy me a cup of coffee.
At
first, I did not really know what to say.
There I was, so proud of the greatness of my compassionate service. And there he was, offering me a cup of
coffee. At first, I saw some humour in the situation – after all, I was wondering how
worn out and weary that I must have been looking to inspire a panhandler to ask
me if he could buy me a cup of coffee.
My
first reaction was to protest; how could I allow him to do such a thing for
me?
And
then I realized the enormity of what that question could mean for my
understanding of the dynamics of power – and of who was serving whom. There I was, convinced that I was the one who
was offering a great and noble service -- and there he was, humbly and
generously offering to go out into a cold winter night to get me a cup of
coffee.
And
so, I responded in the only way that I could.
“Sure,
that would be great,” I said.
“Do
you want cream with that?”